DSpace Repository

Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Methods: A Critical Review

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bhunya, P. K.
dc.contributor.author Panda, S. N.
dc.contributor.author Goel, M. K.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-06-11T15:55:19Z
dc.date.available 2021-06-11T15:55:19Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.citation The Open Hydrology Journal,2011, 5: 1-8 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://117.252.14.250:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6034
dc.description.abstract The present study critically reviews the synthetic unit hydrograph (SUH) methods available in hydrologic literature. The study reveals that the traditional methods of SUH derivation, e.g., Snyder, SCS, traditional methods like Snyder and TS methods always does not yield satisfactory results, and theier application to the practical engineering problems is tedious and combursome. On the other hand, probability distribution functions (pdfs) based SUH methods are easy to apply, easily met the UH criterion, i.e. the area under the curve is unity, and rely on a stronger mathematical base and sounder hydrologic perception. The recent pdfs used for deriving UHs in ungauged catchments, address the SUH shapes with more flexibility than the earlier pdfs proposed by Gray (1961) for SUH derivation. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License, en_US
dc.subject SUH en_US
dc.subject Synthetic Unit Hydrograph en_US
dc.subject SUH derivation en_US
dc.subject SUH methods en_US
dc.title Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Methods: A Critical Review en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account