DSpace Repository

Flood analysis using generalized logistic models in partial duration series

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bhunya, P. K.
dc.contributor.author Singh, R. D.
dc.contributor.author Berndtsson, R.
dc.contributor.author Panda, S. N.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-09-17T11:07:02Z
dc.date.available 2019-09-17T11:07:02Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Hydrology 420-421 (2012) 59-71 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://117.252.14.250:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3584
dc.description.abstract As a generalization of the commonly assumed Poisson distribution (PD) used to estimate the annual number of peaks over threshold in partial duration series (PDS) model, the negative binomial (NB) distribution is proposed in this study. Instead of generalized pareto distribution (GPD) and exponential distribution (ED) models popularly applied to predict the probability of the exceedances of peak over threshold, the performance of the general logistic distribution (GLD) models is analyzed. Two different models for analyzing extreme hydrologic events are compared, based on, PDS and annual maximum series (AMS), respectively. The performance of the two models in terms of uncertainty of T-year event estimator [q(T)] is evaluated in the cases of estimation with the method of moments (MOMs), maximum likelihood (ML), and probability weighted moments (PWMs). The annual maximum distribution corresponding to a PDS model with Poisson distributed count of peaks above threshold and GLD for flood exceedances was found to be an extreme value type I (EV1) distribution. The comparison between PDS and AMS is made using ratio of variance of the T-year event estimates, which is derived analytically after checking the reliability of the expressions with Monte Carlo simulations. The results reveal that the AMS/ NB–GLD and PDS/GLD models using PWM estimation method give least variance of flood estimates with the PDS model giving marginally better results. From the overall results, it was observed that the Poisson distribution performs better, where the difference between mean (l) and variance of counts of threshold exceedances is small otherwise the NB distribution is found to be efficient when used in combination with generalized logistic distribution in the PDS model, and this is more prominent for l < 1.4. Hence, in such cases when the PDS data have a mean less than this, the AMS/NB–GLD and PDS/GLD should be a better model for q(T) estimation as compared to PDS/ED. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.subject Negative binomial distribution en_US
dc.subject Generalized pareto distribution en_US
dc.subject Exponential distribution en_US
dc.subject Probability weighted moments en_US
dc.subject Monte Carlo simulations en_US
dc.subject General logistic distribution en_US
dc.title Flood analysis using generalized logistic models in partial duration series en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account