Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://117.252.14.250:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7445
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBisht, Deepak Singh-
dc.contributor.authorChowdhury, Bratati-
dc.contributor.authorRawat, Soban Singh-
dc.contributor.authorPottakkal, Jose George-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-03T04:09:06Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-03T04:09:06Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-024-05069-4-
dc.description.abstractWith the advent of numerous global precipitation estimates (GPEs) in the recent decades, dependability of hydrologists has lessened on the station data as the GPEs can be readily availed and utilized. Since the skills of GPEs may differ from region-to-region, it is vital to analyse their ability in resolving the regional precipitation climatology using appropriate statistical methods. In this study, a total of five GPEs, viz., APHRODITE, PERSIANN-CDR, CHIRPS, CMORPH, and IMERG were evaluated for their abilities in resolving regional precipitation climatology of WHR with respect to gridded precipitation product of India Meteorological Department (IMD). Different performance indicators i.e., Probability of Detection (POD), False Alarm Ratio (FAR), Normalised Root Mean Square Deviation (NRMSD), Pearson Correlation Coefficient (CC) and Skill Score (SS) were used for evaluating the GPEs. Multicriterion Decision Making (MCDM)approaches i.e., Compromise Programming (CP), Cooperative Game Theory (CGT), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Weighted Average Technique (WAT), and Fuzzy TOPSIS were used for ranking the GPEs across different grids in WHR. Entropy based weight assignment to NRMSD, CC, and SS were performed while applying them in MCDM methods. Group Decision Making (GDM) approach utilizing spearman correlation coefficient and additive ranking rule was employed to obtain the final ranking of GPEs from multiple rankings assigned through different MCDM methods. Across 115 grids, APHRODITE exhibits superior performance compared to other GPEs in 89 grids. Conversely, CHIRPS and CMORPH emerge as the least favorable products among the five GPEs across more than 70 grids, being consistently ranked either 4th or 5th. Notably, IMERG was identified as the best-performing product in 14 grids and as the second-best product in 63 grids, positioning it as the second most suitable option after APHRODITE for monthly rainfall time series analysis. Similar results, as detailed in the paper, were also obtained for month-wise rainfall time series analysisen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.subjectGlobal precipitation estimates (GPEs)en_US
dc.subjectData scarce Western Himalayan Regionen_US
dc.titlePerformance ranking of global precipitation estimates over data scarce Western Himalayan Region of Indiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Research papers in International Journals

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Restricted Acess.pdf411.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.