Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://117.252.14.250:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6034
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBhunya, P. K.-
dc.contributor.authorPanda, S. N.-
dc.contributor.authorGoel, M. K.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-11T15:55:19Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-11T15:55:19Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationThe Open Hydrology Journal,2011, 5: 1-8en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://117.252.14.250:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6034-
dc.description.abstractThe present study critically reviews the synthetic unit hydrograph (SUH) methods available in hydrologic literature. The study reveals that the traditional methods of SUH derivation, e.g., Snyder, SCS, traditional methods like Snyder and TS methods always does not yield satisfactory results, and theier application to the practical engineering problems is tedious and combursome. On the other hand, probability distribution functions (pdfs) based SUH methods are easy to apply, easily met the UH criterion, i.e. the area under the curve is unity, and rely on a stronger mathematical base and sounder hydrologic perception. The recent pdfs used for deriving UHs in ungauged catchments, address the SUH shapes with more flexibility than the earlier pdfs proposed by Gray (1961) for SUH derivation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License,en_US
dc.subjectSUHen_US
dc.subjectSynthetic Unit Hydrographen_US
dc.subjectSUH derivationen_US
dc.subjectSUH methodsen_US
dc.titleSynthetic Unit Hydrograph Methods: A Critical Reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Research papers in International Journals

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Restricted Acess.pdf411.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.