Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://117.252.14.250:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4540
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVasan, A.-
dc.contributor.authorRaju, K. Srinivasa-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-21T05:06:27Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-21T05:06:27Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.urihttp://117.252.14.250:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4540-
dc.description.abstractIn the present study an evolutionary based optimization algorithm, Differential Evolution (DE) and a heuristic optimization algorithm, Simulated Annealing (SA) is compared and applied to a case study of Bisalpur project, Rajasthan, India. Crops grown in the command area are Jowar, Maize, Groundnut, Soyabean, Wheat, Barley, Gram, and Mustard. Bisalpur project covers two districts, namely, Tonk and Sawai Madhopur for irrigation and Ajmer, Jaipur and Tonk districts for drinking water. The objective of irrigation planning model is to determine suitable cropping pattern, reservoir operating and release policy which yields maximum net benefits from irrigation while meeting drinking water requirements. The planning model is subjected to constraints such as continuity equation, land area, irrigation diversion, reservoir, canal capacity and crop area restrictions. Fifty percent dependable inflow level is considered for the planning scenario. Population size (NP), Crossover constant (CR), Weighting factor (F) and ten different strategies (variations) of DE and initial temperature (T), number of iterations (n) performed at a particular temperature and cooling rate (CoR) of SA are analyzed in the present planning problem. Results of SA are compared with solution of DE. It is observed that the net benefits (crores of rupees) obtained from ten DE strategies are 95.1901, 97.722 (constraint violation), 96.027 (constraint violation), 94.997 (constraint violation), 95.1903, 95.183, 95.1903, 95.1901, 95.1211 and 95.1903 whereas it is 95.1897 in case of SA with a combination of n=150, CoR=0.95 and T=1000. Efforts were also made to analyze the CPU time for different combinations of DE and SA on a PC with PIV 2.4GHz./256MB RAM/40GB HDD configuration. It is concluded that DE/rand-to-best/I/bin is the best strategy for the planning problem with maximum net benefits of 95.1903 crores of rupees which is slightly higher as compared to SA.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAllied Publishers Pvt. Limited, New Delhien_US
dc.subjectReservoir System Optimizationen_US
dc.subjectRajasthanen_US
dc.subjectDifferential Evolution (DE)en_US
dc.subjectSimulated Annealing (SA)en_US
dc.title6-Comparison of Differential Evolution abd Simulated Annealing for Reservoir System Optimization - A Case Study in Rajasthanen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Water Quality : Monitoring, Modelling and Prediction



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.