Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://117.252.14.250:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3616
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoel, N. K.-
dc.contributor.authorSeth, S. M.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-20T10:12:19Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-20T10:12:19Z-
dc.date.issued1988-
dc.identifier.urihttp://117.252.14.250:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3616-
dc.description.abstractDesign of water resources structures needs estimation of hydrologic and meteorologic events for different return periods. This can be obtained through frequency analysis approach. The extreme value type 1(EV-1) distribution is widely used for frequency analysis of extreme events in hydrology and meteorology. Its successful application depends upon the accuracy with which its parameters can be estimated. However, there is no universal agreed method of estimating its parameters. This paper explains and statistically compares various parameter estimation techniques cited in literature using data of different sample sizes generated by Monte Carlo Simulation. The analysis of results reveals that method of mixed moments and incomplete mean procedures are least accurate methods for estimating the parameters and quantiles of EV-1 distribution. The methods based on probability weighted moments, principle of maximum entropy and maximum likelihood give nearly similar results and are recommended for general use.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNational Institute of Hydrologyen_US
dc.subjectExtreme value type-1 (EV-1) distributionen_US
dc.titleTheme-2-2-Comparative study of different parameter estimation techniques for EV-1 distribution.en_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
Appears in Collections:International Seminar on Hydrology of Extremes (Floods & Low Flows) 1-3 December 1988 at Roorkee (India)



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.